Jump to content

Talk:Dating Do's and Don'ts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Chris857 (talk | contribs) at 18:26, 5 March 2018 (added the video itself). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconFilm: Documentary / American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

Shouldn't the title be Dating Dos and Don'ts ?

It should, but I copied it right off the film, and that is how it is spelled there. I checked at least three times. Danny 23:18, 11 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for checking!

According to the 1983 [Guide to English Usage], "do's" is correct. I googled this, and according to the info I can find, it looks like "do's" is actually the more traditional spelling; it's only fairly recently that grammarians have begun advocating "dos" instead. 68.226.239.73 02:05, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this was going to be one of the how-to pages. --Charles A. L. 15:18, Feb 23, 2004 (UTC)

^^ --capnez 20:11, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes webtoon

The stuff about the webtoon, which doesn't even have exactly the same title, really doesn't belong here, but I left it, because I don't have the time to create a separate article right now, and because the article is pretty short. For a reference about the webtoon, I used the Looney Toons wiki at Wikia, which is probably not considered a good source, but I figure it is better than nothing. Peter Chastain (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]