Jump to content

Registry of Open Access Repositories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oa01 (talk | contribs) at 09:30, 20 February 2018. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
ROAR Growth map of repositories and contents, 1 Aug 2011

The Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) is a searchable international database indexing the creation, location and growth of open access institutional repositories and their contents. ROAR was created by EPrints at University of Southampton in 2003.[1][2][3][4] It began as the Institutional Archives Registry and was renamed Registry of Open Access Repositories in 2006.[5] To date, over 3,000 institutional and cross-institutional repositories have been registered.[6]

ROARMAP

ROAR's companion Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP), is a searchable international database of policies. It charts the growth of open access mandates and policies adopted by universities, research institutions and research funders that require their researchers to provide open access to their peer-reviewed research article output by depositing it in an open access repository. It was created by EPrints at University of Southampton in 2003.[7][8][9][10][11] As of October 2015, open-access mandates have been adopted by more than 520 universities and more than 75 research funders worldwide.[12] ROARMAP mandates are classified in terms of strength and effectiveness[13] in MELIBEA[14]

References

  1. ^ Brody, T, Carr, L, Hey, JMN, Brown, A, Hitchcock, S (2007) PRONOM-ROAR: Adding Format Profiles to a Repository Registry to Inform Preservation Services. The International Journal of Digital Curation 2(2)
  2. ^ McDowell, CS (2007) Evaluating Institutional Repository Deployment in American Academe Since Early 2005: Repositories by the Numbers D-Lib 13 (9/10)
  3. ^ Xia, J. (2011). "An anthropological emic-etic perspective on open access practices". Journal of Documentation. 67 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1108/00220411111105461.
  4. ^ Krishnamurthy, M.; Kemparaju, T. D. (2011). "Institutional repositories in Indian universities and research institutes". Program: electronic library & information systems. 45 (2): 185–198.
  5. ^ "Open Access News". 22 February 2006. Archived from the original on 12 February 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ "Browse by Repository Type". ROAR. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  7. ^ Moskovkin, VM (2008) Institutional policies for open access to the results of scientific research . Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 35 (6) 269–273, doi:10.3103/S0147688208060075
  8. ^ Sale, AHJ (2007) The patchwork mandate . D-Lib Magazine, 13 (1/2). ISSN 1082-9873
  9. ^ Manikandan, S; N Isai Vani (2010) "Restricting access to publications from funded research: Ethical issues and solutions." Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 56(2): 154–156
  10. ^ Lyons, Charles; H Austin Booth (2010) "An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management". Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 16(2): 1080124 doi:10.1080/08963568.2011.554786
  11. ^ Hurrell, A. C. (2012) Open access policies on scholarly publishing in the university context. BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape, 4(3).
  12. ^ "Browse by Policymaker Type". ROARMAP. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  13. ^ Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.8174.
  14. ^ [MELIBEA directory and estimator of institutional open-access policies http://www.accesoabierto.net/politicas/default.php ]
Wikidata has the property:
Links related to mandates
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Registry_of_Open_Access_Repositories&oldid=826657183"