Jump to content

Registry of Open Access Repositories

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Oa01 (talk | contribs) at 09:14, 20 February 2018 (cat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
ROAR Growth map of repositories and contents, 1 Aug 2011

The Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) is a searchable international database indexing the creation, location and growth of open access institutional repositories and their contents. ROAR was created by EPrints at University of Southampton in 2003.[1][2][3][4] To date, over 3,000 institutional and cross-institutional repositories have been registered in ROAR.[5]

ROAR's companion database, the Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP), is a searchable international registry charting the growth of open access mandates adopted by universities, research institutions and research funders that require their researchers to provide open access to their peer-reviewed research article output by depositing it in an open access repository.

ROARMAP

The Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP) is a searchable international registry charting the growth of open-access mandates adopted by universities, research institutions and research funders that require their researchers to provide open access to their peer-reviewed research article output by depositing it in an open access repository. ROARMAP was created by EPrints at University of Southampton in 2003.[6][7][8][9][10] As of October 2015, open-access mandates have been adopted by more than 520 universities and more than 75 research funders worldwide.[11] ROARMAP mandates are classified in terms of strength and effectiveness[12] in MELIBEA[13]

References

  1. ^ Brody, T, Carr, L, Hey, JMN, Brown, A, Hitchcock, S (2007) PRONOM-ROAR: Adding Format Profiles to a Repository Registry to Inform Preservation Services. The International Journal of Digital Curation 2(2)
  2. ^ McDowell, CS (2007) Evaluating Institutional Repository Deployment in American Academe Since Early 2005: Repositories by the Numbers D-Lib 13 (9/10)
  3. ^ Xia, J. (2011). "An anthropological emic-etic perspective on open access practices". Journal of Documentation. 67 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1108/00220411111105461.
  4. ^ Krishnamurthy, M.; Kemparaju, T. D. (2011). "Institutional repositories in Indian universities and research institutes". Program: electronic library & information systems. 45 (2): 185–198.
  5. ^ "Browse by Repository Type". ROAR. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  6. ^ Moskovkin, VM (2008) Institutional policies for open access to the results of scientific research . Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 35 (6) 269–273, doi:10.3103/S0147688208060075
  7. ^ Sale, AHJ (2007) The patchwork mandate . D-Lib Magazine, 13 (1/2). ISSN 1082-9873
  8. ^ Manikandan, S; N Isai Vani (2010) "Restricting access to publications from funded research: Ethical issues and solutions." Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 56(2): 154–156
  9. ^ Lyons, Charles; H Austin Booth (2010) "An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management". Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 16(2): 1080124 doi:10.1080/08963568.2011.554786
  10. ^ Hurrell, A. C. (2012) Open access policies on scholarly publishing in the university context. BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape, 4(3).
  11. ^ "Browse by Policymaker Type". ROARMAP. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
  12. ^ Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.8174.
  13. ^ [MELIBEA directory and estimator of institutional open-access policies http://www.accesoabierto.net/politicas/default.php ]
Wikidata has the property:
Links related to mandates
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Registry_of_Open_Access_Repositories&oldid=826655546"