Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ring with the approximation property

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) at 23:22, 18 February 2018 (→Draft:Ring with the approximation property). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Draft:Ring with the approximation property

Draft:Ring with the approximation property (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Up for G13 again today. Redirect reversed 6 months ago. No progress on draft since August 2014. Legacypac (talk) 08:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Move to the mainspace: this is already perfectly a fine stub in the mainspace. If the notability of the topic is in question (which I highly doubt), then it can be nominated for an AfD. — Taku (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Promote unless there's some more general article this could be appropriately merged into. Given that the author who I presume is a subject matter expert has not suggested one, I doubt there is. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I must mention that the notion is closely related to Artin's approximation theorem; I don't think the merger works since the theorem is only about a formal power series ring. (But I can be persuaded if someone editor can make a good argument.) — Taku (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, Redirect, and Protect Merge what reasonable content into the parent article Noetherian ring, redirect the Draft page to parent, and protect it. Though to be perfectly honest there's no real content to add. I specifically vote against moving to mainspace, because this would not pass WP:V as there's not one cited fact that would allow this to survive. Promoting to mainspace only to have it be Speedied, PRODed, or AFDed is a perfect example of process for process sake. Hasteur (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm confident that it can survive an AfD (given my experience of writing many similar articles in the mainspace). Do you have a specific reason to support the topic is not notable? -- Taku (talk) 23:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Draft:Ring_with_the_approximation_property&oldid=826409383"