Talk:One-to-one computing

Computing Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Education Start‑class

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

List of possible sources

Results in Maine after 2 years

Edutopia article

Schools doing one-to-one - Resources

replacing books with laptops article

eSchool News article

OLPC - Program to get one laptop per child in third world countries

NY Times article about problems with one-to-one

US Depatment of Ed information

MrRyanH 16:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Outline

What is One to One Computing
Why do it - Benefits
Risks/Concerns
Costs
Suppliers
Experiences
Recommendations

Parental controls
iTeams (technical support BY students)

One-to-one teaching strategies
Summarized list of who is doing it now

MrRyanH 16:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tag

It seems to me that this article repeatedly violates Wikipedia's manual of style, so I've added the cleanup rewrite template. I apologize if this article does not need cleanup.
CampWood (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would favour a rewrite. I made many of the changes in 2017/2018 on the basis of; - The NY-Times may 2017 article about the googlification of education (rapid growth of Chromebooks ) - Futuresource-consulting's reports on sales of devices into the schools in the USA. - Some real-world examples. - Then a structured approach to take a sample of schools and check their 1:1 status from their own published material. - A comparison of the schools that were mentioned in the 2007 NY Times article as having abandoned 1:1 and comparing it to what their status was now.

Need more verifiable reseach sources.

Yoasties (talk) 20:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]