Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Feminist (talk | contribs) at 10:16, 14 January 2018 (Template:Uruguay NFT results: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 6

unused; almost all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 10:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; almost all redlinks Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

should be merged with Uruguayan_general_election,_2009#Results or deleted Frietjes (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; out-of-date Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates Template:WikiProject Ballet? Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

inactive; unlikely to be used in the future Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful navigation box since all the links take you to category space, instead of to the corresponding articles Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; links zero articles (all are category links which are already covered by the category tree) Frietjes (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly oppose (hear me out?) - While the "Years in countries" categories, pages, and templates are definitely something to be improved upon; these templates, in my honest opinion, would provide helpful navigation between topics in the yearly history of various countries. These templates, while not perfect and currently relatively unused, would provide a structured, helpful way to easily find any page or category on any year in any given country. I've been trying to help organize the mess of pages and categories that exist in this mini-WikiProject of articles, but it's far too soon to make a bold move like deleting it. Hopefully, instead of deleting these works in progress, they can be improved upon by helping manage and create the pages and categories involved. Paintspot Infez (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

. Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates navigation provided by Template:Year in Chad Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly oppose (see above), and possibly discuss the usages of the two "Year in countries" template branches? - See above for my comments on the matter of the "Year in countries" project. However, the differences between and differing usages of the two branches of "Year in countries" templates (the ones with "Years" and the ones with "Year") should probably be discussed further, in order to help better the parts of the Wiki focusing on various nations. Paintspot Infez (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

. Frietjes (talk) 14:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; appears to duplicate tables in 2008 Primera División de México Apertura Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per author approval Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates Template:La Galissonnière class cruisers Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; duplicates the maps in the article Frietjes (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

It is always debatable whom to include in such template. Such cases are better served as category rather navbox. Störm (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Content category with Template:Category explanation.
{{Content category}} does the same job as {{Category explanation}}, except that {{Category explanation}} uses {{Hatnote}}, which {{Content category}} should but doesn't. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]