Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PureScript (programming language)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 01:37, 21 December 2017 (Signing comment by Mikon - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
PureScript (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so it fails GNG. cnzx 23:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The search links are skewed: with just "PureScript" they give much more hits and few of them refer to unrelated topic, if any.
For programming languages, the following is a significant channel of coverage, not NYT nor mainstream news portals (by the time a language reaches them, it's usually old, stale and technologically obsolete): https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/purescript
Also, scientific papers about a cutting edge programming language tend to be in preparation or on the level of BSc or MSc theses, as opposed to established programming languages, where there is a lot of misleading hits, because then the language is used as a basis for extensions, experiments, or just as a minor tool, so the papers are not really about such a language.
I propose to wait and see, for otherwise, we risk a deletion/creation loop, with more and more arguments against deletion each time, but with less and less people willing to waste time creating the ephemeral article, even once the topic is very notable at some point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikon (talkcontribs) 01:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]