Talk:String theory/Comments

  Merely the consideration that more and more mathematicians and physics professors are moving away from String theory and fraud is being revealed in many funded researches that show that the results in research in this area were fabricated. In the lower section of negative aspects of String, Peter Woits book; "Not Even Wrong" is confused with his blog, of the same title, and the flood of new publications disproving String Theory are either unknown or not mentioned. All in all this article presupposes to have a favorable disposition to String as opposed to a non-biased position. Many are postulating that the CERN experiments are another waste of funds and will disclose nothing that would support String , which leaves many calling String a Philosophy or Religion as opposed to science. There are very few alternative concepts to alternative theories such as; Alpha ;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant And non-commutative-geometry, as applied to quantum considerations, you do have an article on this subject, but it must have been written by someone assured of String, as it leaves with an incomplete understanding of the potential. As this goes perhaps to CD, that may be a hallmark of how Wikipedia will be considered in the future. Perhaps this entire article should be reviewed, as it's intent should be disputed before it's too late. The cat is out of the bag, and this article won't help I fear.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0224076051/103-2137952-9126259?v=glance&n=283155 Peter Woit