Jump to content

Vulnerabilities Equities Process

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Anome (talk | contribs) at 15:19, 16 November 2017 (Determination to disseminate or restrict: precis). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP) is a U.S. federal government process for determining how the government should treat zero-day computer security vulnerabilities; whether to disclose them to the public to help improve general computer security, or to keep them secret for offensive use against the government's adversaries.[1]

The VEP was developed in the period 2008-2009, but only became public in 2016, when the government released a redacted version of the VEP in response to a FOIA request by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.[2][3]

Following public pressure for greater transparency in the wake of the Shadow Brokers affair, the U.S. government made a more public disclosure of the VEP process in November 2017.[1][4]

Organization

According to the VEP plan published in 2017, the Equities Review Board (ERB) is the primary forum for interagency deliberation and determinations concerning the VEP.[4] The ERB meets monthly, but may also be convened sooner if an immediate need arises.

The ERB will consist of representatives from the following agencies to represent the view of their respective agency head:

The National Security Agency serves as the executive secretariat for the VEP.[4]

Process

According to the November 2017 version of the VEP, the process is as follows:

Submission

When an agency finds a vulnerability, it will notify the VEP secretariat as soon as is possible. The submission will include information describing the vulnerability including identification of the vulnerable products or systems, and the agency's recommendation to either disseminate or restrict the vulnerability information.[4]

Notification

The VEP secretariat will notify all VEP participants of the submission within one business day, requesting them to respond if they have an relevant interest.[4]

Equity and discussions

An agency expressing an interest must indicate whether it concurs with the original recommendation to disseminate or restrict within 5 business days. If it does not, it will hold discussions with the submitting agency and the VEP secretariat within seven business days to attempt to reach consensus. If no consensus is reached, the participants will suggest options for the ERB.[4]

Determination to disseminate or restrict

Decisions whether to disclose or restrict a vulnerability should be made quickly, in full consultation with all concerned agencies, and in the overall best interest of the competing interests of the missions of the U.S. government. As far as possible, determinations should be based on rational, objective methodologies, taking into account factors such as prevalence, reliance, and severity. ERB determinations for follow-on actions and next steps should be reached in a timely fashion.

If the ERB members cannot reach consensus, they will vote on a preliminary determination. If an agency with an equity disputes that decision, they may, by providing notice to the VEP secretariat, elect to contest the preliminary determination. If no agency contests a preliminary determination, it will be treated as a final determination.[4]

Handling and follow-on actions

If vulnerability information is released, dissemination will be made in the most expeditious manner and when possible within 7 business days. Disclosure of vulnerabilities submitted for equity review will be conducted according to agreed-upon guidelines that are consistently and responsibly followed by all members. The submitting agency is presumed to be most knowledgeable about the vulnerability and, as such, will be responsible for disseminating vulnerability information to the vendor. If the submitting agency so chooses, it may elect to delegate dissemination responsibility to another agency on its behalf. The releasing agency will promptly provide an information copy of dissemination information to the VEP Executive Secretariat for record keeping. Additionally, the releasing agency is expected to follow-up so the ERB can determine whether the vendor’s action meets USG requirements. If the vendor chooses not to address a vulnerability, or is not acting with urgency consistent with the risk of the vulnerability, the releasing agency will notify the VEP Executive Secretariat, and the USG may take other mitigation steps.[4]

Criticism

The VEP process has been criticised for a number of deficiences, including restriction by non-disclosure agreements, lack of risk ratings, special treatment for the NSA, and less than whole-hearted commitment to disclosure as the default option.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b Newman, Lily Hay. "Feds Explain Their Software Bug Stash—But Don't Erase Concerns". WIRED. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  2. ^ Electronic Privacy Information Center. "EPIC - Vulnerabilities Equities Process". epic.org. Retrieved 2017-11-16. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  3. ^ "Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP)". Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2016-01-18. Retrieved 2017-11-16.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h "Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process for the United States Government" (PDF). www.whitehouse.gov. November 15, 2017. Retrieved 2017-11-16. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  5. ^ "The four problems with the US government's latest rulebook on security bug disclosures". Retrieved 2017-11-16.

See also