Talk:Mutual recursion

Computer science B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

B

This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Use ALL the languages

The examples in this article are a little hectic - we start at Standard ML, then go to C (which isn't syntactically valid, functions must have { and }, not to mention bool is more characteristic of C++ and must be explicitly included or defined in C), then swing by Python (which isn't marked as such), back to Standard ML, and finally we end with Scheme. Shouldn't this be simplified to a smaller number of consistent pseudocode examples (that both academics and programmers can understand), instead of a handful of examples in different languages that all say the same thing? Or at the very least, can we pick one language and stick with it? 74.103.134.250 (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tree vs Forest example is not great

The tree vs forest example doesn't make sense. A tree is not the "parent" of a "forest" in a real sense. Perhaps a more appropriate parent-child example could be found?