Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apple Neural Engine
Appearance
- Apple Neural Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No need to keep an article which contains only two sentences Darius robin (talk) 12:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 14:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Nominator fails to advance a valid reason for deletion, per WP:TOOLITTLE. We do not delete stub articles based on length or word count but rather notability, and the first three refs are reliable sources. Enough to meet WP:GNG, imo. Now maybe there's a commonsense merge target....? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree with the nominators reasoning for deletion but in my opinion the Neural Engine itself isn't notable, the A11 chip is and therefore these two sentences should just be merged into the A11 article... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 06:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, no objection to a merge, if preferable, per WP:PRESERVE. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)