Jump to content

Talk:Stack-based memory allocation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Widefox (talk | contribs) at 16:04, 8 October 2017 (Assessment: Computing: importance=Low, software=y, software-importance=Low, hardware=y, hardware-importance=Low, security=y, security-importance=Low (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / Security Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer security (assessed as Low-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:
Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...
  • Review importance and quality of existing articles
  • Identify categories related to Computer Security
  • Tag related articles
  • Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
  • Identify articles for improvement
  • Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
  • Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Template:Findsourcesnotice

Growing the stack up

I removed an uncited assertion that growing the stack in the opposite direction would reduce the risk of a buffer overflow. This is incorrect, see [1] for a description of how this is done (article on how to exploit stack overflows on HP-UX PA-RISC machines, which grow the stack up)...see Stack buffer overflow for further explanation of why this is not true. Also, there was an assertion that it was the operating system, and not the hardware the determines which direction the stack grows. There are some processors that allow for a software defined direction that the stack grows, but ultimately this is done by the hardware, and in almost every case, it is not an option available to the operating system to change. --Michael Lynn 02:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Added Manojkumar.R.S (talk) 07:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]