Talk:Userscript
Appearance
![]() | JavaScript Unassessed | |||||||||
|
To be or not to be?
Doesn't Userscript deserve its own page? Userscript is/can/should be the generic term, instead of "Greasemonkey Script". Such script functionality is now broader than Greasemonkey, http://userscripts.org/ is the largest repository of scripts, and the term is even used on this site on List of augmented browsing software. Gpk-urmc (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. Userscripts are in widespread use, and "userscript" is a common term amongst computer users, including Firefox users (via Greasemonkey), WikiMedia users (MediaWiki supports userscripts), etc. Writing userscripts is one of the main uses of JavaScript. Not having an article on this would be an unfortunate oversight. The Transhumanist 02:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
There's other sites too...
Are there any policies on this site which prevent listing "Sleazy Fork" as one of the many userscript sites around?
Would there be enough to make a page listing them off or should a table be simply added to the page?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Turijet (talk • contribs) 18:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)