This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
Either the DoD relies heavily of Wikipedia editors for their writing or there seems to be an unacceptable level of plagiarism of the DoD by the Wikipedia editors. I don't think the DoD cares much because it serves to disseminate their concepts more widely but we should care. What is the point of repeating a DoD article in a WP article? In this article I think I can resolve it by the use of the quotation mark and additional references. The refs in this article are mainly all dead links anyway, naturally, because they all use dated DoD sites. So, I plan to use much of what is there but in quotes.Botteville (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
