Jump to content

Talk:Fundamental theorem of software engineering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kvng (talk | contribs) at 16:17, 26 September 2017 (Assessment: +Computing: science=y, science-importance=, software=y, software-importance= (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / CompSci Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

This expression is considerable older than 2005. In 1976 a spoof examination question at University of Cambridge Computer laboratory , written by an undergraduate for the examiners read "All problems in computer science can be solved by another layer of virtual indirection. Discuss" I now who set it (I was an examiner). It was a dig at the operating system group of Roger Needham and the CAP project

Jpff (talk) 17:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a similar expression in "Supporting distributed applications: experience with Eden" in the "Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, 1-4 December 1985, Orcas Island, Washington", in a footnote on p. 183: "Flexibility can be regained through that universal panacea, as an extra level of indirection." It cites "Needham, R. Quoted on p279 of" Wulf; W. A., Levin, R. and Harbison, S. P. HYDRAIC.mmp: An Experimental Computer System. McGraw-Hill, 1981, which further supports Jpff's comment. I don't have access to that book to verify. -- Andrew Dalke

Regarding notability

I encountered the acronym FTSE (with this meaning) in a book, which didn't define it or cite a source, so I tried to look it up in Wikipedia, but that failed. When I eventually found out the meaning, I created this short article to save other people the same trouble in the future. I think it should be possible to find the term in Wikipedia. Perhaps it doesn't need its own article, but on the other hand, there's no harm in having short articles. Eleuther (talk) 15:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]