Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Elmidae (talk | contribs) at 16:36, 8 September 2017 (keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find significant independent coverage. Article's sources are affiliated. Reads like an advertisement.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose deletion. It certainly needs re-writing though. There are at least 76 references using this source in other articles, and it is a useful resource for plant names. As the article says, it is linked to, and hence to a degree recommended by, highly reputable online plant databases, such as GRIN, IPNI, etc. I don't have time to re-write it now, but it can be done. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In many cases this is the most readily available source for translating plant names into multiple languages, and thus sees frequent recognition and use in other large databases and in sources all over the web. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]