Jump to content

Talk:Operator algebra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mark viking (talk | contribs) at 04:01, 8 September 2017 (Assessment: +Mathematics: class=Start, priority=Low, field=algebra (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

It would be nice to have at least one example of an Operator Algebra. Most of the other pages on mathematical objects list a few examples. CarlFeynman (talk) 23:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page says "Operator algebras are in general non-commutative rings" Whereas, the page about rings say rings have to have the property that their operators are commutative. What gives? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.104.212 (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In general, a ring's product is not necessarily commutative. Some authors, the ones who will only be talking about commutative rings, include commutativity in the definition for convenience. It's just a matter of convention. The phrase "non-commutative ring" refers to a ring whose product is not assumed to be commutative. However, I think the Wikipedia page on rings should not include commutativity since the "standard" definition does not. 70.30.23.131 (talk) 16:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]