Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database
Appearance
- Multilingual Multiscript Plant Name Database (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't find significant independent coverage. Article's sources are affiliated. Reads like an advertisement. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. It certainly needs re-writing though. There are at least 76 references using this source in other articles, and it is a useful resource for plant names. As the article says, it is linked to, and hence to a degree recommended by, highly reputable online plant databases, such as GRIN, IPNI, etc. I don't have time to re-write it now, but it can be done. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2017 (UTC)