Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Informational Development
- Informational Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not read like a neutral presentation of the views of reliable sources, but partly like an opinion essay and partly like a blurb for a governmental program. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Yes it is clearly an essay like structure with sources thrown in to support specific point. Overall topic doesn't seem to be notable, as presented here, even if various aspects of it might be. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 05:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- This is just a work in progress, and rather requires more research. A point about controversy in Africa, where resources could be better spent on basic living will be added soon. It was a mistake that it was published so soon, and normally it should have gone to sandbox. I'll also search for some community initiatives and roles of NGO. Perhaps listing by State fell short of the point. Thanks for your efforts. --PasswordDoesNotGoHere (talk) 13:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - The author appears to be proposing draftification, which is fine with me. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)