Jump to content

Talk:Spherical wave transformation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by D.H (talk | contribs) at 06:53, 21 July 2017 (Conformal groups: Re.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhysics: Relativity C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the relativity task force.

The sentence at the end of the 1st paragraph is contradictory. If the Poincare group is applicable to all phenomena, then it is applicable to ED. But if the conformal group is applicable only to ED (as asserted by the final phrase) then since the Poincare group is a sub of the Conformal group, ED is also applicable. Fix the antecedents whoever wrote this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YouRang? (talkcontribs) 18:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully, the text is more clear now. --D.H (talk) 19:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conformal groups

The section relating Lorentz and Mobius says:

"While the 15-parameter conformal group of R4 contains the Lorentz group as a subgroup,"

as introduction. This statement may be misinterpreted as the signature on R^4 makes a difference, and an all positive signature generates a conformal group involving only Euclidean angles. The reference here must be more specific to eliminate that view. The spacetime conformal group does include the Lorentz group, but the indefinite planes in R^4 involve hyperbolic angles that are respected by the Lorentz transformations. — Rgdboer (talk) 23:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's true - but the Lorentz group being a subgroup is already pointed out in the section "Relation to electrodynamics". So I removed that line in the new section. Please feel free to make some changes to improve the text. --D.H (talk) 06:53, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]