User talk:ProgrammingGeek

This is ProgrammingGeek's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 7 days

00:29:35, 13 June 2017 review of submission by Autoupdate64

Autoupdate64 (talk · contribs)
- Albert J. Fornace Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Draft:Albert J. Fornace Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am writing concerning an entry that I wrote for Albert Fornace reviewed by Programming Geek. I corrected the use of references as you suggested several weeks ago. I see that they are now correct in the draft version. Is the entry waiting to be reviewed once more?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ProgrammingGeek&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AFC_submission/declined/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Albert_J._Fornace_Jr.#

~ ~ ~ ~ Autoupdate64

13:22:09, 24 June 2017 review of submission by Mevduran

Mevduran (talk · contribs)
- Draft:The Cuban Brothers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have generated the changes for this page.

Please comment on Talk:Audio converter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Audio converter. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Identitarian movement

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Identitarian movement. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Luminar review question

Hi there,

There's a page which was submitted a few months ago - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Luminar You've reviewed its first version and suggested to make it neutral and add more references. After that, I've corrected these issues and added as many references as I could find and have re-written it with a neutral tone without any promotional and advertorial sentences. Yet, it was declined by your colleague, with a note stating that this page "says nothing about it". It's rather confusing since I believe that if I add more information about the product, it might sound promotional and non-neutral, but without it - it's noninformative according to the last reviewer. Please advice.

Thank you! (Jenyajc (talk) 13:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC))— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenyajc (talk • contribs) 11:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]