Talk:Interrupt vector table

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Regarding this article's relevance, and merging other articles' content

The entire text for an existing article at this location had been removed and replaced with a redirect to the "Interrupt Descriptor Table" article, which is descriptive specifically of the x86 implementation of this concept. This is a concept that applies to multiple processor architectures, and therefore, should have a generalized article. Information regarding specific implementations of this concept should be placed into sub-sections of the generalized article 75.84.15.136 (talk) 01:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They're called interrupt vector tables on Intel. Leave well enough alone and don't apply the typical Wikipedia skew.

Interrupt vector vs interrupt vector table

The lead says "An entry in the interrupt vector is the address of the interrupt handler." Shouldn't this read interrupt vector table? MaigoAkisame (talk) 13:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]