Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Module:Linguistic

Module:Linguistic

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia is monolingual, thus modules like these two are not necessary. Only used in one user sandbox. Ppp ery 02:18, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wt:lua has been notified of this discussion.— Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 03:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question - I apparently don't understand, but what is the benefit of deleting? Robert McClenon (talk) 09:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep The English Wikipedia is not monolingual – for example, our policy states that references may be in any language (or character set). This module may find use in future applications – such as fetching references from a central wikibase repository – and on balance, the effort of recreating it when it is needed probably outweighs the few kilobytes of server space that it takes up. --RexxS (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment' Module:Fallback is almost completely dependent on a non-existent mediawiki message. Ppp ery 13:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fallback. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Linguistic. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, Module:Linguistic requires Module:Fallback: you can't delete the latter without breaking the former. --RexxS (talk) 00:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]