Talk:Uniform Commercial Code
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Conspiracy theories, again.
Here in Italy there are some people that try to no pay taxes, fines et cetera quoting UCC. Statements are very bizzare like "The Declaration of I Am" in which you can read sentences as "I, also perceived as numerous given identifiers, alias, abbreviations, and idem sonans, inclusive of Source of all that Is, Source Prime, Eternal Essence, Father, God, Allah, Yaweh"... I read that this stuff come from USA, but in the UCC's lemma of en Wikipedia there is not a word about this social phenomena. There is any study? Any analysis of this? Thank you.--Adriano G. V. Esposito (talk) 11:01, 2 October 2014 (UTC) An example: http://www.oltre12.net/2014/03/le-dichiarazioni-di-io-sono-traduzione.html --Adriano G. V. Esposito (talk) 11:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Wikisource
s:Wikisource:Requested texts#Uniform Commercial Code. Hausratte (talk) 12:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- They can't add it, at least not in full, because ALI maintains copyright on it and charges $146.00 for hard copy of the official version. Certainly, Wikisource can add versions of the UCC as enacted in particular states, but every state enacts it in their own strange way and they all deviate from the official version in one way or another in hundreds of ways. There are one or two huge multi-volume UCC treatises that actually have EVERY version of every section (both official and as-enacted in all U.S. jurisdictions), but those treatises are privately published and are horrendously expensive. --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Uh-oh, I didn't know about it :( Thank you for explanation. I'll close the request. Hausratte (talk) 10:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles