Talk:Rocket Lab
![]() | Spaceflight Start‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | New Zealand Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
New contract
Launches contracted for Moon Express: [1]. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Sources for improving the article
Here are a bunch of sources, some of them quite good, for potentially improving the article. Cheers. N2e (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11473933, July 2015. Launch site selection article, with cgi design overview, and animated video of launch from a beach spit location. "[L]aunch pad half the size of a tennis court."
- http://spacenews.com/rocket-lab-selects-new-zealand-launch-site/, from Space News, July 2015. More informative article on launch site, etc.
- http://www.3news.co.nz/nznews/greens-rocket-concerns-blasted-into-orbit-2015070211#axzz3ejE3xvpl, New Zealand Greens opposition.
- http://www.wired.com/2015/07/feds-big-problem-private-rocket-launches/, Wired, July 2015.
- http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-rocketlab-satellites-20150805-story.html, Aug 2015.
- http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/70995652/rocket-lab-satellite-launches-filling-up-fast, Aug 2015.
- http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK1508/S00363/rocket-lab-considering-an-additonal-launch-site-in-wairoa.htm,
- http://www.nbr.co.nz/ask-peter-beck
- https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-39.035173,177.4180311,9z, Google map of the Wairoa location. Proposed launch site is not directly at Wairoa, but about 20 km to the east at Onenui Station, on the southern tip of Mahia peninsula, which has no launch overflight limitations to the east.
- http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/afternoons/audio/201767483/wairoa,-gateway-to-the-galaxy, Wairoa mayor interview
- https://www.sprsa.org/sites/default/files/conference-presentation/Schneider-Rocket%20Lab%20general%20introduction%20%28reduced%20video%29.pptx, June 2015 presentation from SPRSA conference.
- http://www.nanalyze.com/2015/09/rocket-lab-carbon-fiber-rockets-powered-by-3d-printing/, September 2015.
- http://www.geekwire.com/2015/moon-express-and-rocket-lab-make-deal-for-lunar-landings-in-2017/, Moon Express has apparently booked several launches related to their Lunar mission interests, in 2017.
- http://spaceref.biz/commercial-space/moon-express-launch-contract-to-be-verified-by-google-lunar-xprize.html
- http://www.parabolicarc.com/2015/10/04/updated-list-smallsat-launch-vehicles/, Oct 2015.
- http://www.rocketlabusa.com/about-us/propulsion/rutherford/, a primary source, but probably okay for specs on their rocket engine.
- http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/70716001/rocket-lab-signs-deal-to-work-with-nasa
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=yEOCq6KcwXo, Rocket Labs video of their team, October 2015.
US company
It is not clear in what way this is a US company or whether it always was a US company. The technical work all seems to be done in NZ. This needs to be explained.Royalcourtier (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Further, the company was founded by a New Zealander (Peter Beck, still the CEO / CTO) in 2006 - <https://www.rocketlabusa.com>. It was incorporated and registered as a company in New Zealand on 29 June 2006 and is still registered as such, with the headquarters shown as being in Auckland, New Zealand - <https://www.companiesoffice.govt.nz/companies/app/ui/pages/companies/1835428>.
Most of the backing companies are currently USA companies, and it has a base in the USA, but the company base remains in New Zealand, its first test launches are in New Zealand, and almost all of the senior staff listed on its website are New Zealanders - <https://www.rocketlabusa.com>. 121.75.117.10 (talk) 22:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC) mckee@paradise.net.nz 10:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- C'mon. New Zealand lover? I don't particularly hold any torches for either the USA or New Zealand. I'm happy to celebrate either - if warranted. I do care about accuracy, though. A few more points -
- I can't track Rocket Lab anywhere on the US Register of Companies. Shouldn't it be there if it is one? (And, as above, the company is registered in New Zealand.)
- It's been funded by several New Zealand Government grants, from the Callaghan Institute - <https://www.callaghaninnovation.govt.nz/grants/grant-recipients?combine=Rocket+Lab&op=Search&field_grant_type_tid=All&field_grant_dates_value%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=&field_grant_dates_value_1%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=)> - which is specifically concerned with New Zealand technical development
- A New Zealand Government minister hailed the May test launch as "the first visible sign of a space industry in New Zealand" - <http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rocket-lab/news/article.cfm?o_id=600723&objectid=11862250>
- Even a correspondent for Reuters from Cape Canaveral - <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-space-rocketlab-idUSKBN16S1IK> - doesn't commit herself on the nationality of the company
- As Royal Courtier says, "This needs to be explained." ~~~~ mckee@paradise.net.nz 7:15, 6 June 2017
History, and Atea-1
The claim by this section that Rocket Lab Ltd. was not "the first private company in the Southern Hemisphere to reach space" because that could not be validated by telemetry downlink, is immaterial.
There was telemetry, but it was not a downlink - it went to a satellite, which is how the location of the payload dart's descent to the sea was determined. Cf. http://www.astronautix.com/a/atea-1.html, where one may read: "Payload recovery – A GPS transceiver used the Inmarsat B satellite constellation to communicate the launch vehicle"
It is this, as well as the known performance of the boost stage (which benefited from telemetry) that permits deduction of the payload apogee being above the Karman line.
The entire tone of the article is deprecating in a manner which makes one wonder about the motives of such edits.
- Go away New Zealand lover! We don't want no New Zealand lovers on WP....
- But seriously, that wording struck me as odd too. I'm going to read the source...
- P.S. Please finish your posts with ~~~~ to sign them. NickCT (talk) 12:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. So here's a source that seems to support the telemetry downlink claim. NickCT (talk) 12:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, the reporter (Karen Graham) seems to believe there was no telemetry downlink. Likewise, the claim of no downlink telemetry was expanded on by Chris Gebhardt, as reported on May 24, 2017 by NASASpaceflight.com. Both reporters seem to have misinterpreted "no telemetry downlink" as meaning "no telemetry at all".
- Ok. So here's a source that seems to support the telemetry downlink claim. NickCT (talk) 12:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'd defer to the assessment of Astronautix ("The standard Atea-1 featured an in-house developed avionics package, recovery systems for land or sea, power supply and payload-avionics interface"). While there was no telemetry downlink to the ground station, there was a telemetry uplink from the launch vehicle to an Inmarsat-B satellite which allowed tracking by GPS.
- Note that such Inmarsat-B services are no longer available to Rocket Lab (because closed down at the start of this year) but back in 2009 the Inmarsat-B services included voice, telex, and data services at 9.6 kbaud as well as high speed data services (up to 128 kbaud). This is easily enough to relay GPS co-ordinates. 122.57.120.63 (talk) 09:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. Here's a second reporter who said the same thing. And another. Clearly these folks got their information from somewhere. Honestly, I don't really care about the technicalities of an "uplink" versus "downlink". All that really matters these on WP is whether information is verifiable (it doesn't even really matter if it's true or not). This info looks verifiable. NickCT (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note that such Inmarsat-B services are no longer available to Rocket Lab (because closed down at the start of this year) but back in 2009 the Inmarsat-B services included voice, telex, and data services at 9.6 kbaud as well as high speed data services (up to 128 kbaud). This is easily enough to relay GPS co-ordinates. 122.57.120.63 (talk) 09:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)