Jump to content

Set TSP problem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cngoulimis (talk | contribs) at 13:20, 27 May 2017 (Illustration from the cutting stock problem: corrections). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In combinatorial optimization, the set TSP, also known as the generalized TSP, group TSP, One-of-a-Set TSP, Multiple Choice TSP or Covering Salesman Problem, is a generalization of the Traveling salesman problem (TSP), whereby it is required to find a shortest tour in a graph which visits all specified subsets of the vertices of a graph. The ordinary TSP is a special case of the set TSP when all subsets to be visited are singletons. Therefore the set TSP is also NP-hard.

There is a direct transformation for an instance of the set TSP to an instance of the standard asymmetric TSP.[1] The idea is to first create disjoint sets and then assign a directed cycle to each set. The salesman, when visiting a vertex in some set, then walks around the cycle for free. To not use the cycle would ultimately be very costly.

The Set TSP has a lot of interesting applications in several path planning problems. For example a two vehicle cooperative routing problem could be transformed into a set TSP,[2] tight lower bounds to the Dubins TSP and generalized Dubins path problem could be computed by solving a Set TSP,.[3][4]

Illustration from the cutting stock problem

The one-dimensional cutting stock problem as applied in the paper / plastic film industries, involves cutting jumbo rolls into smaller ones. This is done by generating cutting patterns typically to minimise waste. Once such a solution has been produced, one may seek to minimise the knife changes, by re-sequencing the patterns (up and down in the figure), or within each pattern (moving reels left or right).

In the above figure, patterns (width no more than 198) are rows; knife changes are indicated by the small white circles; for example, the patterns 2-3-4 have a roll of size 42.5 on the left - the corresponding knife does not have to move. Each pattern represents a TSP set, one of whose permutations must be visited. For instance, for the last pattern, which contains two repeated sizes (twice each), there are 5! / (2! × 2!) = 30 permutations. The number of possible solutions to the above instance is 12! × (5!)6 × (6!)4 × (7!)2 / ((2!)9 × (3!)2) ≈ 5.3 × 1035. The above solution contains 39 knife changes, and has been obtained by a heuristic; it is not known whether this is optimal. Transformations into the regular TSP, as described in [5] would involve a TSP with 5,520 nodes.

References

  1. ^ Charles Noon, James Bean (1993). "An efficient transformation of the generalized traveling salesman problem". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. ^ Satyanarayana G. Manyam, Sivakumar Rathinam, Swaroop Darbha, David Casbeer, Yongcan Cao, Phil Chandler (2016). "GPS Denied UAV Routing with Communication Constraints". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Satyanarayana G. Manyam, Sivakumar Rathinam (2016). "On Tightly Bounding the Dubins Traveling Salesman's Optimum". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Satyanarayana G. Manyam, Sivakumar Rathinam, David Casbeer, Eloy Garcia (2017). "Tightly Bounding the Shortest Dubins Paths Through a Sequence of Points". Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ Charles Noon, James Bean (1993). 265366022_An_efficient_transformation_of_the_generalized_traveling_salesman_problem "An efficient transformation of the generalized traveling salesman problem". {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help)