Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypothesis based testing
- Hypothesis based testing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Keep - included several citations from international journals and magazines. Also added online references. Vishsank (talk)17:30, 25 May 2017 (IST)
A test methodology. No attempt made to show notability. Little better than original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notabiltiy, has a certain air of promoting a pet concept. The only references are to the creator's website and slideshow, and all illustrations that specifically refer to the software testing procedure are directly from these sources (the creator having waived copyright). I am not familiar enough with the field to know if there is anything unique about what is described, or if someone is just trying to advance a neologism (or a detailed formalization) for what is in effect standard practice, but without independent referencences, we can't know whether the term is used outside of the company where it was developed. Agricolae (talk) 16:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom Power~enwiki (talk) 21:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per
WP:SNOW,WP:NOTWEBHOST, and WP:OR. I've taught many subjects, from Business law to living environment, and none of it makes sense. Perhaps it's just too esoteric. Bearian (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin: Vishsank inserted its !vote above, but after, mine. I have since stricken out one argument. Bearian (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)