Talk:Weak artificial intelligence
![]() | Computing: Software / CompSci Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Narrow != Weak
Narrow AI may well be what is defined in the article, but the weak/strong AI distinction is VERY different. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room#Strong_AI
ALso Ray Kurzeuil and all the sigularity thing is interesting and entertaining, but is NOT reality, but speculation.
With respect, I call for a return to the version before 149.254.58.203's edits.
DISCUSS.
Samfreed (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Altho speculative now, the future is a real thing and it's coming here soon.
I suggest that where the first sentence says: real-world,
All real-world systems labeled "artificial intelligence" of any sort are weak AI at most. It could say: present day world. 173.225.148.173 (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
I've just made lots of edits to improve the article.
Here are some links I didn't use:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.181.50 (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.58.203 (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)