Jump to content

Talk:Weak artificial intelligence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Widefox (talk | contribs) at 10:35, 25 May 2017 (Assessment: -Disambiguation; -Alternative Views; +Computing: class=Start, importance=Mid, science=y, science-importance=Mid, software=y, software-importance=Mid (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / CompSci Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Narrow != Weak

Narrow AI may well be what is defined in the article, but the weak/strong AI distinction is VERY different. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room#Strong_AI

ALso Ray Kurzeuil and all the sigularity thing is interesting and entertaining, but is NOT reality, but speculation.

With respect, I call for a return to the version before 149.254.58.203's edits.

DISCUSS.

Samfreed (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Altho speculative now, the future is a real thing and it's coming here soon. I suggest that where the first sentence says: real-world,

All real-world systems labeled "artificial intelligence" of any sort are weak AI at most.   
It could say: present day world.  173.225.148.173 (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just made lots of edits to improve the article.

Here are some links I didn't use:


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.181.50 (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.58.203 (talk) 17:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]