Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Befreak programming language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Celestianpower ^háblame 16:26, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Befreak programming language

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:50, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia isn't the place for things invented at University in one day. This is nothing beyond a joke. Do not even put it onto a list if there are no assertions of notability. - Hahnch e n 17:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Raw stub, based entirely off befunge and easily merged. LinaMishima 01:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think that the mass delete was out of order. This one certainly deserves the chop. Ohconfucius 05:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Hahnchen; as close it is possible to get to no content without being speedied. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:54, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Here's the past esolang AfD box (many, but not all, of these are relevant):

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.

Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:

No result Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004
Keep Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004
Delete Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005
Delete 1, keep 2 Articles for Deletion (3 languages), February 24 2006
No result Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006
No consensus Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006
Delete most Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006
Overturn and relist Deletion Review, September 7 2006

--ais523 08:43, 20 September 2006 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.