Talk:Leeds University Library's Cookery Collection

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Articles for creation B‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 15 April 2017 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

England B‑class Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Yorkshire B‑class

	Yorkshire portal Leeds University Library's Cookery Collection is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Libraries B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Imogen at Leeds Uni Library (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.

Conflict of Interest

If any users would like to discuss with me any potential problems caused by my conflict of interest, then I am happy to do so. I have tried to edit without bias and comply with Wikipedia guidelines at all times. I have a full declaration on my user page which explains that I am contributing towards the Wikimedia initiative GLAM. Please contact me at my talk page. Imogen at Leeds Uni Library (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a valuable article and you have edited it carefully and objectively. Congratulations on having it accepted at AfC! Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Project Library

I agree with the B class rating for the most part. Some constructive criticism: The lead needs some more citations and fewer 1-2 sentence paragraphs. You have a ton references throughout the rest of the article, the lead should reflect the rest of the page and therefore you can easily bring more information into it. The history section need some work - there are a lot of subsections, which is fine, but the overview is only one sentence long. I'd like to see these expanded if possible. I think the rest of the article from there down is superb, granted I haven't done a comprehensive review of all references.