Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bubble programming language

Bubble programming language

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 17:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - As per the previous AFDs and the surrouding AFDs. - Hahnchen 17:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Absence of any references other to a description of the language suggests the language is of no importance whatsoever. The jocular description confirms that the creator intends it to be an amusement or tour-de-force, not a serious programming language. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete this one seems quite different to the other languages, but it's core premise is not one supportive of additional works. Verifiability is also hard. LinaMishima 01:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Mergeto Bubble sort. Ohconfucius 05:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Here's the past esolang AfD box (many, but not all, of these are relevant):

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started. Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates: No result Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004 Keep Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004 Delete Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005 Delete 1, keep 2 Articles for Deletion (3 languages), February 24 2006 No result Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006 No consensus Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006 Delete most Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006 Overturn and relist Deletion Review, September 7 2006

--ais523 08:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

• Format List of esoteric programming languages fully with tables like the two first paragraphs ("0-9" and "A") so far, then merge there, then delete. --ZeroOne 14:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • "merge and delete" is feasible but frowned on, as it is laborious for a closing sysop to do correctly (preserving history as required by the GFDL.) Do you really want merge-and-delete, or just plain old merge-and-redirect? Dpbsmith (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Well, merge and redirect is OK for me, too. --ZeroOne 15:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 20:10, 26 September 2006 (UTC)