Jump to content

Talk:Community-based program design/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:Community-based program design
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Damien Linnane (talk | contribs) at 09:45, 9 May 2017 (Lead comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 03:35, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Be advised rather than bringing up any minor issues I will just fix them myself. If you're unhappy with any changes I make simply revert them and we can instead discuss the issue here. Also feel free to reply to my concerns as they come in; don't feel like you have to wait for the entire review to be finished. Freikorp (talk) 08:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    "Community-based program design is a social program design" - two uses of 'program design' within seven words reads poorly.
    "This program design approach depends on the participatory approach" - same issue with two uses of the word 'approach' within six words.
    "One advantage is a learning experience between a consumer and a social services provider.[2] One disadvantage is a limited availability of resources" - merge this into one sentence.
    "The models that can be used for it are ..." I can honestly say this is the longest single sentence I've ever seen on Wikipedia. You need to break it up.
    "the change around us" - is 'us' the right word here? Would it be better as the change around 'the community', or just 'the change'?
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Regarding the model image - what is this images source? Is it based on information specifically found in source No. 2 (being the only source in the 'Socio-ecological model' sub-section)? I'm not an expert on image licensing, but if it isn't based on a specific source, I think this image would constitute as original research. Also you could probably make a better version of it in a program like Microsoft Paint. The text doesn't appear to be centered all the way down and there are different spaced gaps between the text and the circles. This isn't a fail point in itself, but I definitely think you can make a better image.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Community-based_program_design/GA2&oldid=779509803"