Talk:Service Data Objects
Appearance
Name collision
There is a near-perfect name collision with CANopen's Service Data Object protocol. Perhaps there should be a (standard) "not to be confused with" message? --Mortense (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Invalid Link
The link to SDO specification "SDO Specifications at OpenSOA" is no longer valid , suggest using http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/testcontent/sdo-specification-java-v2-131073.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.65.159.98 (talk) 11:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Confirmation
Confirming that the link
as well as
seemed to be broken as of 2017-04-19.