Jump to content

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ProgrammingBot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 (talk | contribs) at 04:48, 13 April 2017 (Discussion: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Operator: ProgrammingGeek (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 17:19, Wednesday, April 12, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Standard Pywikibot

Function overview: Removes {{adoptme tags from pages that meet certain criteria

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:Bot requests#Adoption Category backlog

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 50-100

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: The bot gets a list of pages in the category "Users seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user".

If the page is in any namespace other than User or User talk, it removes the {{adoptme}} tag

If the page is in the User or User talk namespace, and the user has not edited in a month, then it removes the tag and adds {{subst:Adoption notice expired for bots}} to the user's talk page

If the page is in the User or User talk namespace and the user has edited within a month, the page is skipped.

This bot will run once daily.

Discussion

  • I understand the rationale and idea here, but I am not familiar with the Adopt-a-User program. Is there an existing policy or guideline that allows users to be removed from the seeking adoption category after 1 month? I have seen on WP:BOTREQ, the original requester saying that there is, but showed no link to this policy. Bots require consensus for any task, so if there is currently none, I would say that perhaps a RfC is needed. I for one would support this RfC, but removing users from a category could prove contentious. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 18:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
TheMagikCow, I honestly took for granted that there was one, however, I can't seem to find one. If no-one can find one, then I will open an RfC. ProgrammingGeek talktome 19:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I found a policy. On the top of Category:Wikipedians seeking to be adopted in Adopt-a-user, it says
Jamesjpk (talk) 01:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm supportive of this task. Based on the banner Jamesjpk found, this is already the maintenance instructions for use of the banner, which documents current "norms" of this process. That's enough consensus for me. That banner's been there since 2011. ~ Rob13Talk 04:48, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]