Talk:Comparison of JavaScript charting libraries

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Software: Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

rgraph wrong licensing

The reference actually says rgraph is "RGraph is open and free to use for non-commercial under the Creative Commons BY-NC license", and not MIT as stated in this article.

Someone edit that table. I would break it if I try. --damiens.rf 03:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Astronouth7303 appears to have fixed this in edit 623193373 on Aug 28.-- era (Talk | History) 12:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Description of D3.js is wrong

D3.js is not a charting framework, but a rather complex document-manipulation library. As such, it can be used to make ANY kind of graph, it has no limitations or supported/unsupported graphs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.88.68.134 (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]