Talk:AtScript

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Computing Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article deletion discussion.

This article should stay as is. It should not be deleted. It doesn't violate any policies for deletion. The top-level deletion note is confusing. (Marni (talk) 07:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC))[reply]

I am not sure I agree with that. It does not seem to be particularly notable and is particularly short. As such it seems like a good candidate for merging (to one or both of either AngularJS or TypeScript). 50.53.1.33 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I feel strongly that this page should not be deleted. While technically it is a stub that will never grow, its existence provides an important historical context that will remain useful for understanding how various things came about. Aluan Haddad (talk) 03:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]