Talk:Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP
![]() | Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Internet Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Clarify wording in server section
It says "Note that no specific support is required from server for DASH content, with the exception of _Live Streaming_" but it's not clear what "Live Streaming" is in this context. There's no part of the HTTP protocol currently defined as "Live Streaming" that I could find. 172.2.203.49 (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC) Ron J
- This is a term specific to streaming media rather than to HTTP itself. In terms of MPEG-DASH, live streaming requires on-the-fly generation of segments and re-generation of manifest file just because of the nature of the media (it just happens "right now", it's not pre-recorded). Common web server cannot handle that. Hence the note about exception of live streaming. Perhaps "Live Streaming" should not be started with capital letters though. Yurriq (talk) 00:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
DASH in title?
Should "DASH" be included as part of the page's name? BambelB (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Perhaps. I've anyway created a redirect from MPEG-DASH The Seventh Taylor (talk) 08:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Link to Adaptive bitrate streaming
Shouldn't this link to: Adaptive bitrate streaming? BambelB (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. Done now. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 08:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Link to MPEG
Shouldn't the navigation boxes {{Compression Formats}} and {{Compression Methods}} be added here? And where should MPEG-DASH fit into these? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 23:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
DASH 264
I noticed the DASH Industry Forum published the v0.9 standard for 'DASH264' [1]. Is this the same as MPEG-DASH or something different? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- I started reading the standard for 'DASH264' [2] and I found on page 7, line 16 that it mentions, as a separate standard, the 'MPEG-DASH' standard. (MoreOrLezFun (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC))
- I think MPEG-DASH standard link need to be updated to [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.253.7.190 (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Is DASH patent encumbered?
It would be good to clarify this information in the article — Bahaltener (talk) 02:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Should HLS be mentioned in Introduction?
There is no need to mention MPEG-DASH is similar to Apples HLS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushikesh90 (talk • contribs) 04:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Also, the introduction states that "MPEG-DASH is the first adaptive bit-rate HTTP-based streaming solution that is an international standard.[1]" (introduced 2012). But HLS has been available as an Internet Engineering Task Force standard since May 2009 (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Live_Streaming).
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130624105147/http://vicky.bitmovin.net:80/mailman/listinfo/libdash-dev to http://vicky.bitmovin.net/mailman/listinfo/libdash-dev
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect to claim that the media is necessarily segmented
In the intro, there's this claim that DASH involves "breaking the content into a sequence of small HTTP-based file segments." I have a 48 minute counter-example I'm looking at, and it's all one file. Maybe this should be removed or qualified.