Talk:Bayesian approaches to brain function

Neuroscience Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Findsourcesnotice

I do not see the references displaying, have I done something wrong? Jockocampbell (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard the above, I found the solution. Jockocampbell (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Currently free energy approaches get dramatically too much cover - they present a small part of the community studying Bayesian Brain. Also I would propose renaming this page "Bayesian approaches to Brain function" and have Bayesian brain forward to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koerding (talk • contribs) 09:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Make it Bayesian approaches to brain function and I'm in favor (no cap for "brain"). Regarding the rest, I think you should feel free to edit the article in whatever way you think improves it. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have a citation to go with the statement that Friston worked on free energy in the 1990s? As it stands the oldest citation is from the mid 2ks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.149.74 (talk • contribs)