Jump to content

Talk:Language bioprogram theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 62.226.227.203 (talk) at 11:07, 18 February 2017 (Articles: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconLinguistics: Applied Linguistics Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Cleanup message

Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.

Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 17:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

The claim that articles are "integral to any creole" can be thrown out immediately by looking at the grammar of creoles that make little or no use of articles, such as Tok Pisin. This is an unsourced claim about a claim of a guy who has apparently only looked at Hawaiian Pidgin and presumably one other creole language (referred to here only as "Creole") and generalised that to "all creoles".