Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2L programming language

2L programming language

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete derivative nn cruft. Once you have seen P′′ (which is cool), you have seen all of these "languages". Leibniz 15:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 20:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.

Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:

No result Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004
Keep Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004
Delete Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005
Delete 1, keep 2 Articles for Deletion (3 languages), February 24 2006
No result Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006
No consensus Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006
Delete most Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006
Overturn and relist Deletion Review, September 7 2006

--ais523 15:47, 18 September 2006 (U T C)

Delete - already merged whilst the concept of overloading by direction is interesting, it's technically nothing new, and not something that new works would be based upon. Lack of verification is an issue. LinaMishima 02:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]