Jump to content

Talk:Primary biliary cholangitis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 01:26, 26 January 2017 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Primary biliary cirrhosis/Archive 1) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMedicine: Pathology C‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by the Pathology task force.


Name Change in 2017?

Is it now time for WP to recognise the change in name too? I would suggest swapping the lead to "Primary biliary cholangitis, previously known as primary biliary cirrhosis, ..." or just use this word order with "also known as ...". For good qualilty sources, please look at: [1] [2] [3] [4] I would propose the article name is also changed, with the redirect changing to be from "primary biliary cirrhosis" to "primary biliary cholangitis". Thanks.Jrfw51 (talk) 18:35, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ICD10 as of 2016 still uses[5]
I am supporting of changing at this point in time to "Primary biliary cholangitis" Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
i agree. let's give this a few more days and see if anybody else weighs in. Jytdog (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest "Primary Biliary Cholangitis, formerly known as Primary Biliary Cirrhosis." There is a precedent for this. I'm not sure what information you need to support this, but please let me know. Newbie. CtotheJ (talk) 09:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
shall we pull the trigger on this tomorrow? Jytdog (talk) 00:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yah that is about a week. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone with plenty of experience perform the name change in order to keep the previous edits and discussion. Not sure my WP skills are up to this! Thanks to all who support this now. Jrfw51 (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PBC level of technical information

I agree the need for the changing of this article into less technical terms, whist maintaining its technical integrity.

I am unfamiliar with the inner workings of WP but would still like to help.

Newbie

CtotheJ (talk) 10:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. WP:MEDMOS is a good read to start with. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]