Talk:Long non-coding RNA

LncRNAs regulated by transcription factors

As of now this section is purely self-promotional — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.88.66.194 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to long non-coding RNA

Moving 'long noncoding RNA' to 'long non-coding RNA' (with hypen). This then conforms with non-coding RNA and is (marginally) more commonly seen in the literature, see pubmed searches for hyphenated (596) vs unhyphenated (522)^{numbers correct as of 10:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)} Jebus989^✰ 10:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Long ncRNAs in translation

I found out that the BC1 is 167 nucleotides long i.e. shorter than 200nt threshold. Here is the link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NR_033762.1

Why do we consider it as LONG non-coding RNA? Dmanagadze (talk) 16:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some LncRNAs are conventional

New research has found that some LncRNA can give rise to peptides. Link here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24705786 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.227.206 (talk) 23:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who started this topic, but based on a Nature paper in 2017 I added discussion about translation of lncRNAs DennisPietras (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]