Jump to content

Talk:String (structure)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Transhumanist (talk | contribs) at 13:53, 13 January 2017 (→Article instead of disambiguation page: indent as hatnote). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Article instead of disambiguation page

(This thread was copied from Talk:String (disambiguation))...

It's kind of disappointing that we don't have an article on string (cord) instead of just a disambiguation page, as it seems like there is enough information for an article (history, how it's made, uses). If someone were to write one, I would support moving this page to string (disambiguation) with a link to it at the top of the new article. -- Kjkolb 11:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the article is encyclopedic and not dictionaric (is that a word?), that would be fine. If/when an appropriate article is created, it would certainly be the primary article. -- Natalya 12:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How would such an article be different than the rope article? -- Mikeblas 01:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It probably wouldn't. :) -- Natalya 03:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages have "(disambiguation)" after the title. This one doesn't. Can someone fix that?Yanwen 22:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages only have "(disambiguation)" if there is a primary article for the term being disambiguated. Since there is no primary article for this term, any search for "String" goes directly to this page, which is a disambiguation page. -- Natalya 23:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"String", "twine" and "cord" are all pretty similar?? Unless someone is aware of a clear distinction between them, the article on twine probably covers them all - with some appropriate links. Natural fibre (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is already a small amount of “article content” at the top of the page, with a definition, list of application and a picture. I suggest:
  • this article content be split from the disambiguation content
  • the article content perhaps be merged into another existing article
  • the title String be blessed as a primary topic and redirected to the new or merged article, leaving String (disambiguation) for the disambiguation content
The Rope article differentiates rope from string by saying that rope is thicker and stronger, so perhaps they should be separate articles. Twine is a rather short article. I don’t really use the term twine, but it seems my definition of string might be broader than the definition given for twine. Maybe twine is a subtopic, and could be a subsection of a String article? Vadmium (talk, contribs) 04:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:String_(structure)&oldid=759849719"