Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of consumer brain–computer interfaces
Appearance
- Comparison of consumer brain–computer interfaces (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page (it is not an encyclopedia article) is one big bucket of WP:OR, with unsourced or an OR assembly of content sourced to company product websites. There is only one independent source in the whole mess. It has been cleaned up some but see how it was. Even now it is basically a bunch of competing advertisements, and it remains a spam magnet. Jytdog (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
KEEP. I Googled "home EEG machine" and this came up. If I had a hard copy encyclopedia I would want some kind of article on EEG machines a consumer can use.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia =/= Consumer reports. We can only have articles where there are multiple, independent reliable sources. This article is 100% WP:OR sourced to company websites. Jytdog (talk) 01:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Not a consmuer report. An article stating home use is now possible due to inexpensive technology and how many are sold. Maybe a subsection of the main EEG article.--Mark v1.0 (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- 'Delete falls somewhere between WP:NOT#OR and WP:NOTCATALOG. Either way, there's no reason to keep or merge. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)