Talk:Recursive Internetwork Architecture
This article sounds very much like something has read John Day's book and coroborated his point of view here...
This is John Day's book and not all of this is good faith. 'The internet ceases to be an internet?' Who agrees with that besides Day and a few groupies? 2605:E000:90C5:A000:1493:686D:69D3:CBD7 (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
I'm curious what are your technical arguments to support that the sentence you are referring to is incorrect. The fact that the "Internet layer" is directly on top of the data link layer makes the current "Internet" a very large IP catenet (concatenation of IP networks). In the current Internet architecture there is no room for network-layer relaying. If you want to do your own non-IP forwarding (or hide your internal network IP routers from the Internet) in your network you have to introduce "patches" in the architecture like "layers 2.5" (MPLS) and all sorts of tunneling (GTP, etc..).
The number of people agreeing with a statement is not correlated to its correctness. Science is not democracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edugrasa (talk • contribs) 08:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
POV marked
Agreed with 2605:E000:90C5:A000:1493:686D:69D3:CBD7. Marked with the POV template until the lack of neutrality is addressed. LodeRunner (talk) 13:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)