Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Help and Support Center

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.17.222.157 (talk) at 12:15, 27 November 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Help and Support Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one-line permanent stub suffers from lack of notability and lack of contents. It is run-of-the-mill, not something that stands out and becomes notable. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • And incorrect too. Manuals only contain manual-like instructions. You can cite a manual only when you want to write a manual. Otherwise, the only thing you get out of a manual for Wikipedia is passing mentions. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 10:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Even if there is a restriction on citing a manual it still doesn't mean that we can't have an article about a manual based on non-manual sources, such as the ones found by Vejvančický's searches. That's really not a difficult concept to grasp, so please try do do so rather than continue to argue about an utterly irrelevant policy. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]