File talk:Comparison convolution correlation.svg
Convolution = Cross-correlation?
it seeems like the convolution example uses a different triangle shaped window from the top row to the lower rows... can anyone correct it?
- The difference is intentional; in convolution, g(t) is horizontally flipped. That's what distinguishes it from cross-correlation. cmɢʟee☎✉ 23:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
The cross-correlation is incorrect. According to the definition in the article, it should be reversed, making it look exactly like the convolution (this is consistent with the statement in the Properties section that "If f is Hermitian, then "). It looks like this diagram was made using a different convention from that in the article. --TSchwenn (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've done a bit of checking and still think that the graphic is correct.
- For convolution, Fig 13-5 in [1] has similar f, g and f * g.
- I couldn't find proper source for cross-correlation, but this video shows MATLAB giving the same result.
- This video summarises the differences. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 01:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- ^ Steven W. Smith. "The Scientist and Engineer's Guide to Digital Signal Processing — Chapter 13: Continuous Signal Processing". Retrieved 19 September 2014.
{{cite web}}
: line feed character in|title=
at position 38 (help)
I found a proper source(s) for cross-correlation. For real-valued functions, it is defined as:
It follows that when the function is symmetrical (as in the figure we're talking about), convolution and cross-correlation are identical. The figure is wrong.
- ^ Bracewell, R. "Pentagram Notation for Cross Correlation." The Fourier Transform and Its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 46 and 243, 1965.
- ^ Papoulis, A. The Fourier Integral and Its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 244-245 and 252-253, 1962.
- ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Cross-Correlation." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Cross-Correlation.html
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-correlation
--Bob K (talk) 22:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Bob K, You've convinced me with the sources and File:Comparison_convolution_james.png. I've updated the graphic and hope it's all right now. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 19:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. Apologies for doubting editors who pointed out my mistake previously.
Asymmetric function to illustrate autocorrelation
IMO it would be more informative if some non-symmetric function (for example g function instead of square f) were used tu illustrate autocorrelation. Marioosz (talk) 17:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)