Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates/Discussion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kelapstick (talk | contribs) at 08:59, 8 November 2016 (Candidates: add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

2016 Arbitration Committee Elections

Status

  • The December 2016 Arbitration Committee Election results have been posted.
  • Please offer your feedback on the election process.

This page collects the discussion pages for each of the candidates for the Arbitration Committee elections of December 2016. To read Candidate Statements and their Q&As during the Nomination process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates. To discuss the elections in general, see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016.

Please endeavor to remain calm and respectful at all times, even when dealing with people you disagree with or candidates you do not support.

Candidates

Layout/format issue

I can't figure out why a "1." shows up to the left of the box with my answer to Biblioworm, it doesn't for the others. If someone can fix that I'd be very thankful.... pinging Mike V or JJMC89  · Salvidrim! ·  21:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Salvidrim!: I've fixed it. There were missing #'s. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I seem to recall seeing the issue before that and trying to remove said # but I must've been the one who broke it in the first place. :p  · Salvidrim! ·  22:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question followup

Thanks for your honesty with your answers, though I admit I am concerned with your "longing to appear as a rebellious devil-may-care badass" and how that might affect your judgment as an arbitrator. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Every guy wants to be James Dean or Indiana Jonnes or Han Solo at some point. Everybody tries to be cool, especially on places like Reddit or with co-workers around the water cooler. It doesn't change how one is when working seriously, for example either at my day job or on Wikipedia.  · Salvidrim! ·  00:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]