Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fizzy extraction

Fizzy extraction

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is too soon for an article. It is as yet unknown how influential this will be or whether it will be known by this name. The paper was published in August and has yet has to be cited in any other published paper. There are no secondary sources in the literature. The second reference in the article is to a news article/interview in Chemical & Engineering News. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it should not be deleted. There are two references. The second one is independent of the inventor. Certainly, the concept is new but modern chemistry is developing much faster than other disciplines or even chemistry one century ago. If the name of the technique is changed later, then the article can be updated accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.195.33.52 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]