Jump to content

Talk:Adaptive Simpson's method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 02:54, 4 October 2016 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.4)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Relation to McKeeman's algorithm?

The proposed algorithm is totally unrelated to that stated in McKeeman's article. McKeeman subdivides the interval into *three* subintervals, and recurses on them. Further, error estimates are based on some difference between certain estimates, however not on asymptotic expansion, where the 15 in this article stems from. Certainly, this algorithm will work. It's much more straightforward and easier to grasp as McKeeman's is, however, they're not the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezander (talkcontribs) 09:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Accuracy

At the end of the first paragraph "quadratic" should be "cubic" since Simpson's rule is exact for cubic polynomials. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.236.89 (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C code

Shouldn't these two lines double Sleft = (h/12)*(fa + 4*fd + fc); double Sright = (h/12)*(fc + 4*fe + fb);

be: double Sleft = (h/6)*(fa + 4*fd + fc); double Sright = (h/6)*(fc + 4*fe + fb);

? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.251.150.71 (talk) 19:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Adaptive Simpson's method. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]